https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123284 The Tribunal upheld the demand of Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for irregular Cenvat credit related to the removal of brine solution without duty payment to their sister concern. It determined that brine solution was marketable and excisable under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR, holding the appellant accountable for duty payment due to the absence of separate accounts for dutiable final products and exempted brine solution. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's limitation plea, directing them to make a pre-deposit within a specified timeframe pending compliance with the order. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:38:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123284 The Tribunal upheld the demand of Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for irregular Cenvat credit related to the removal of brine solution without duty payment to their sister concern. It determined that brine solution was marketable and excisable under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR, holding the appellant accountable for duty payment due to the absence of separate accounts for dutiable final products and exempted brine solution. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's limitation plea, directing them to make a pre-deposit within a specified timeframe pending compliance with the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123284