<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 710 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the direction for re-opening the assessment of the impugned Bill of Entry by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unwarranted. The Tribunal found that a comprehensive re-look at the entire proceedings should have been directed instead of focusing solely on the Bill of Entry. The part of the order remanding the matter for re-assessment was upheld, and the original authority was directed to consider the issue comprehensively. The appeal by the Revenue was disposed of in line with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 710 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the direction for re-opening the assessment of the impugned Bill of Entry by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unwarranted. The Tribunal found that a comprehensive re-look at the entire proceedings should have been directed instead of focusing solely on the Bill of Entry. The part of the order remanding the matter for re-assessment was upheld, and the original authority was directed to consider the issue comprehensively. The appeal by the Revenue was disposed of in line with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>