<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 709 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the absence of an appealable order from a competent authority, emphasizing the importance of jurisdiction and proper authorization in appeal processes. The arguments on res judicata and cited decisions were considered but did not change the outcome based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 709 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the absence of an appealable order from a competent authority, emphasizing the importance of jurisdiction and proper authorization in appeal processes. The arguments on res judicata and cited decisions were considered but did not change the outcome based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>