<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 708 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recognised its inherent power to extend an existing stay where a full waiver of pre-deposit had already been granted and the appeal remained pending. It held that coercive recovery by the Revenue was unjustified before the appeal was heard, and therefore restrained recovery of the dues until disposal of the appeal. The miscellaneous application was allowed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 708 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recognised its inherent power to extend an existing stay where a full waiver of pre-deposit had already been granted and the appeal remained pending. It held that coercive recovery by the Revenue was unjustified before the appeal was heard, and therefore restrained recovery of the dues until disposal of the appeal. The miscellaneous application was allowed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>