<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123272</link>
    <description>In remand proceedings, the adjudicating authority is bound by the scope of the remand and cannot reopen issues that have already attained finality. Where the earlier remand had confined valuation to Rule 7A, the authority was required only to explain and recompute the value under that rule after hearing the assessee, and could not substitute a different valuation basis. The demand was also confined to the normal period because the extended limitation finding had not been challenged. The matter was therefore remitted only for limited recomputation under Rule 7A, with the limitation ruling in favour of the assessee left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123272</link>
      <description>In remand proceedings, the adjudicating authority is bound by the scope of the remand and cannot reopen issues that have already attained finality. Where the earlier remand had confined valuation to Rule 7A, the authority was required only to explain and recompute the value under that rule after hearing the assessee, and could not substitute a different valuation basis. The demand was also confined to the normal period because the extended limitation finding had not been challenged. The matter was therefore remitted only for limited recomputation under Rule 7A, with the limitation ruling in favour of the assessee left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>