https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123269 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to revoke the Customs House Clearing Agent's license for violating Regulations 13(d) and (e) and 20(c) of the CHALR, 2004. The CHA knowingly facilitated the misdeclaration and import of goods, leading to the forfeiture of the CHA's security deposit. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, emphasizing the seriousness of aiding misdeclaration in customs operations and the sufficiency of evidence supporting the charges. en-us Mon, 24 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123269 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to revoke the Customs House Clearing Agent's license for violating Regulations 13(d) and (e) and 20(c) of the CHALR, 2004. The CHA knowingly facilitated the misdeclaration and import of goods, leading to the forfeiture of the CHA's security deposit. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, emphasizing the seriousness of aiding misdeclaration in customs operations and the sufficiency of evidence supporting the charges. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123269