https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123268 The Settlement Commission admitted the applications of the applicant and certain co-applicants under the Customs Act, 1962, following a remand by the Bombay High Court. The applicant was directed to deposit the admitted duty liability and execute a bond. Despite compliance, the Revenue delayed depositing cheques due to a pending Supreme Court matter. The High Court ruled the application maintainable without a bill of entry, leading to the admission of the application. Seized goods were provisionally released upon payment of duties and a security deposit. However, the application of M/s. I.P. Patel & Co. was rejected for failure to admit duty liability. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:53:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123268 The Settlement Commission admitted the applications of the applicant and certain co-applicants under the Customs Act, 1962, following a remand by the Bombay High Court. The applicant was directed to deposit the admitted duty liability and execute a bond. Despite compliance, the Revenue delayed depositing cheques due to a pending Supreme Court matter. The High Court ruled the application maintainable without a bill of entry, leading to the admission of the application. Seized goods were provisionally released upon payment of duties and a security deposit. However, the application of M/s. I.P. Patel & Co. was rejected for failure to admit duty liability. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123268