<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 370 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the authorities regarding the confiscation of betel nuts, citing insufficient evidence provided by the appellant to challenge the findings. Additionally, the Tribunal found the penalty imposed on the appellant to be lenient compared to the value of the goods owned, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 370 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the authorities regarding the confiscation of betel nuts, citing insufficient evidence provided by the appellant to challenge the findings. Additionally, the Tribunal found the penalty imposed on the appellant to be lenient compared to the value of the goods owned, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>