<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 368 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Notification No. 47/01 is clarificatory and applies retrospectively, allowing the appellant to benefit from Notification No. 8/01. The appellant&#039;s products were reclassified under the appropriate chapter headings for basic metals. Consequently, the appeal was allowed entirely, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 368 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Notification No. 47/01 is clarificatory and applies retrospectively, allowing the appellant to benefit from Notification No. 8/01. The appellant&#039;s products were reclassified under the appropriate chapter headings for basic metals. Consequently, the appeal was allowed entirely, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>