<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 668 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal regarding the provisional release of goods under Section 110-A was not maintainable before it under Section 129-A of the Customs Act. It clarified that the order for provisional release did not constitute an order of adjudication but rather a temporary measure pending final adjudication. The Tribunal also addressed uncertainties regarding adjudication by the Commissioner or a subordinate officer, suggesting that issues related to High Court directives should be raised in the High Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the procedural differences between provisional measures and final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 668 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal regarding the provisional release of goods under Section 110-A was not maintainable before it under Section 129-A of the Customs Act. It clarified that the order for provisional release did not constitute an order of adjudication but rather a temporary measure pending final adjudication. The Tribunal also addressed uncertainties regarding adjudication by the Commissioner or a subordinate officer, suggesting that issues related to High Court directives should be raised in the High Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the procedural differences between provisional measures and final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>