<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 665 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the extended time-limit for demand of excise duty, ruling that the demand cannot be challenged based on limitation grounds. Additionally, it determined that the additional amounts received by the appellants should be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes, as they were related to the supply of higher quantities of goods. The Tribunal clarified that the nature of the contract did not affect the assessable value determination and upheld the inclusion of additional amounts in the taxable value. The penalty imposed was set aside, with only interest payable as per law, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:03:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 665 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the extended time-limit for demand of excise duty, ruling that the demand cannot be challenged based on limitation grounds. Additionally, it determined that the additional amounts received by the appellants should be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes, as they were related to the supply of higher quantities of goods. The Tribunal clarified that the nature of the contract did not affect the assessable value determination and upheld the inclusion of additional amounts in the taxable value. The penalty imposed was set aside, with only interest payable as per law, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>