<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 697 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123231</link>
    <description>Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was construed as permitting only deduction of the determined credit from the existing credit balance and lapse of any excess credit. Where the manufacturer&#039;s available credit was less than the amount determined, the rule contained no express mechanism to recover a further sum. In the absence of specific statutory authority for additional recovery, the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 697 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123231</link>
      <description>Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was construed as permitting only deduction of the determined credit from the existing credit balance and lapse of any excess credit. Where the manufacturer&#039;s available credit was less than the amount determined, the rule contained no express mechanism to recover a further sum. In the absence of specific statutory authority for additional recovery, the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>