<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 695 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123229</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that refilling carbon-di-oxide gas from tankers into cylinders does not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; under Chapter Note 10 of Chapter 28 as it does not involve re-packing from bulk to retail packs or any treatment to render the product marketable. The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants, stating that their activity falls outside the scope of Chapter Note 10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 695 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123229</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that refilling carbon-di-oxide gas from tankers into cylinders does not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; under Chapter Note 10 of Chapter 28 as it does not involve re-packing from bulk to retail packs or any treatment to render the product marketable. The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants, stating that their activity falls outside the scope of Chapter Note 10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>