<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 687 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123221</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee against the denial of interest payment was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai. The Tribunal held that there was no delay in refund payment and found no error in its final order. Additionally, the application to rectify the alleged mistake of not linking two appeals for a joint hearing was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 687 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123221</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee against the denial of interest payment was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai. The Tribunal held that there was no delay in refund payment and found no error in its final order. Additionally, the application to rectify the alleged mistake of not linking two appeals for a joint hearing was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>