<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 685 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123219</link>
    <description>Where an appellate finding that duty was paid under protest attains finality, that issue cannot be reopened in later refund proceedings. A refund claim also cannot be resisted on a new unjust enrichment plea raised for the first time in appeal when it was not part of the earlier show cause notice or original adjudication. On those facts, the refund was not deniable on either ground and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 685 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123219</link>
      <description>Where an appellate finding that duty was paid under protest attains finality, that issue cannot be reopened in later refund proceedings. A refund claim also cannot be resisted on a new unjust enrichment plea raised for the first time in appeal when it was not part of the earlier show cause notice or original adjudication. On those facts, the refund was not deniable on either ground and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>