https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123217 The Tribunal held that the duty liability on fabrics not used for export should not fall on the respondent but on the supplier who paid the duty, as per the joint bond agreement. The Tribunal found that the duty paid by the supplier should be credited to the respondent, preventing double payment. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, rejecting the revenue's appeal and confirming no revenue loss, as the respondent was entitled to credit for the duty paid by the supplier when clearing the final products domestically. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:57:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123217 The Tribunal held that the duty liability on fabrics not used for export should not fall on the respondent but on the supplier who paid the duty, as per the joint bond agreement. The Tribunal found that the duty paid by the supplier should be credited to the respondent, preventing double payment. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, rejecting the revenue's appeal and confirming no revenue loss, as the respondent was entitled to credit for the duty paid by the supplier when clearing the final products domestically. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123217