https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123216 A CESTAT Ahmedabad summary order directed that the papers be placed before the President for constitution of a Larger Bench to decide whether excess payments for the period 1986 to 1998 can be adjusted against short payments or refunded under the amended proviso to Rule 9B, introduced with effect from 25-6-1999. The operative issue is the reach of the amended proviso in relation to earlier payment discrepancies, and the matter was referred for authoritative determination. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:47:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123216 A CESTAT Ahmedabad summary order directed that the papers be placed before the President for constitution of a Larger Bench to decide whether excess payments for the period 1986 to 1998 can be adjusted against short payments or refunded under the amended proviso to Rule 9B, introduced with effect from 25-6-1999. The operative issue is the reach of the amended proviso in relation to earlier payment discrepancies, and the matter was referred for authoritative determination. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123216