https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123211 The case involved a dispute over the classification of accessories of card cans. The Appellate Tribunal ruled that the limitation period for demanding differential duty should be counted from the date of issuance of show cause notices within the six-month period under Section 11A, covering the period from May 1992 to February 1994. The Tribunal confirmed the availability of Modvat credit for the assessee. The Revenue's appeal was partially allowed, upholding Modvat credit availability and adjusting the calculation of the limitation period for demanding differential duty. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:10:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123211 The case involved a dispute over the classification of accessories of card cans. The Appellate Tribunal ruled that the limitation period for demanding differential duty should be counted from the date of issuance of show cause notices within the six-month period under Section 11A, covering the period from May 1992 to February 1994. The Tribunal confirmed the availability of Modvat credit for the assessee. The Revenue's appeal was partially allowed, upholding Modvat credit availability and adjusting the calculation of the limitation period for demanding differential duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123211