<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 676 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123210</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 103/87-C.E. was conditional on the ship having borne customs duty at the prescribed rate of Rs. 1400 per LDT. Because the ship had been imported earlier when a lower rate applied, and the required duty at the stipulated rate was not paid, the condition for exemption was not met. The notification could not be ended beyond its express terms to cover ships imported before that rate came into force, so the exemption claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 676 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123210</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 103/87-C.E. was conditional on the ship having borne customs duty at the prescribed rate of Rs. 1400 per LDT. Because the ship had been imported earlier when a lower rate applied, and the required duty at the stipulated rate was not paid, the condition for exemption was not met. The notification could not be ended beyond its express terms to cover ships imported before that rate came into force, so the exemption claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>