https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123206 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, as there was insufficient evidence to prove that the final product bore the disputed brand name. The judgment emphasized the distinction between procuring raw materials with a specific brand and manufacturing the final product with that brand, ultimately granting consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:46:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123206 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, as there was insufficient evidence to prove that the final product bore the disputed brand name. The judgment emphasized the distinction between procuring raw materials with a specific brand and manufacturing the final product with that brand, ultimately granting consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123206