<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 670 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Sri Raja Vinayagar Mills Ltd., vacating the penalty imposed under Section 11AC. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with statutory provisions on duty collection and refund, clarifying that returning excess duty to buyers does not negate the obligation to deposit the amount with the Government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 670 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Sri Raja Vinayagar Mills Ltd., vacating the penalty imposed under Section 11AC. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with statutory provisions on duty collection and refund, clarifying that returning excess duty to buyers does not negate the obligation to deposit the amount with the Government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>