<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 663 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the redemption of goods purchased by the appellants, who were unaware that the goods were imported under the E.P.C.G scheme. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority to determine the redemption fine, with the appellants given a fair opportunity to present their case. The decision permitted the redemption of the goods upon payment of the fine in lieu of confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 663 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the redemption of goods purchased by the appellants, who were unaware that the goods were imported under the E.P.C.G scheme. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority to determine the redemption fine, with the appellants given a fair opportunity to present their case. The decision permitted the redemption of the goods upon payment of the fine in lieu of confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>