<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 363 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123188</link>
    <description>Automatic Voltage Stabilizers were examined against Sl. No. 255 of Notification No. 5/98, which granted concessional duty to goods other than Programmable Process Controllers. The notification&#039;s explanation treated a Programmable Process Controller as an automatic regulator of electrical quantities, or an apparatus for automatically controlling non-electrical quantities through an electrical phenomenon varying with the factor controlled. Because Automatic Voltage Stabilizers regulate electrical voltage to maintain a constant supply despite input fluctuations, they answer that description and fall within the excluded category. On that basis, they are not eligible for the exemption under Sl. No. 255.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 363 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123188</link>
      <description>Automatic Voltage Stabilizers were examined against Sl. No. 255 of Notification No. 5/98, which granted concessional duty to goods other than Programmable Process Controllers. The notification&#039;s explanation treated a Programmable Process Controller as an automatic regulator of electrical quantities, or an apparatus for automatically controlling non-electrical quantities through an electrical phenomenon varying with the factor controlled. Because Automatic Voltage Stabilizers regulate electrical voltage to maintain a constant supply despite input fluctuations, they answer that description and fall within the excluded category. On that basis, they are not eligible for the exemption under Sl. No. 255.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>