<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 360 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order due to the unjustified rejection based solely on filing delay. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision after granting a personal hearing to the appellant, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity to challenge assessments and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s authority to condone reasonable delays in filing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 360 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order due to the unjustified rejection based solely on filing delay. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision after granting a personal hearing to the appellant, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity to challenge assessments and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s authority to condone reasonable delays in filing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>