<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 504 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123158</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the impugned order and forfeiture order. It found that the petitioner had fulfilled its export obligation under the Import License and that the enforcement of the bond and bank guarantee was unjustified. The petition was allowed with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 504 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123158</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the impugned order and forfeiture order. It found that the petitioner had fulfilled its export obligation under the Import License and that the enforcement of the bond and bank guarantee was unjustified. The petition was allowed with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>