<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 657 - CESTAT, , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision that converting used lubricating oil into reusable lubricating oil does not constitute &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Central Excise Act. Relying on precedents, including a Supreme Court dismissal of a similar case, the Tribunal found that the process did not create a new commodity. The appellant&#039;s argument referencing a different case law was rejected, emphasizing the similarity between the oil reclamation processes. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the earlier decision and maintaining that the process did not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 657 - CESTAT, , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision that converting used lubricating oil into reusable lubricating oil does not constitute &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Central Excise Act. Relying on precedents, including a Supreme Court dismissal of a similar case, the Tribunal found that the process did not create a new commodity. The appellant&#039;s argument referencing a different case law was rejected, emphasizing the similarity between the oil reclamation processes. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the earlier decision and maintaining that the process did not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>