<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 345 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123145</link>
    <description>A temporary Custom House Agent licence had to be converted only if the prescribed qualification was secured within the stipulated period, and repeated failure by the authorised signatory justified withdrawal under the licensing regulations. The earlier court direction required only compliance with law and did not compel extension of the licence beyond the regulatory framework. The regulations also did not permit appointment of a new person after withdrawal of the temporary licence. On that basis, the withdrawal of the temporary licence was treated as lawful and the request for a permanent licence was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 345 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123145</link>
      <description>A temporary Custom House Agent licence had to be converted only if the prescribed qualification was secured within the stipulated period, and repeated failure by the authorised signatory justified withdrawal under the licensing regulations. The earlier court direction required only compliance with law and did not compel extension of the licence beyond the regulatory framework. The regulations also did not permit appointment of a new person after withdrawal of the temporary licence. On that basis, the withdrawal of the temporary licence was treated as lawful and the request for a permanent licence was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>