<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 493 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123129</link>
    <description>Sales promotion commission was treated as prima facie eligible as an input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, because such promotional activity is not confined to the factory premises and may necessarily take place outside it. On that prima facie view, the objection based on the absence of activity within the factory was rejected at the interim stage. The appellant was therefore granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 493 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123129</link>
      <description>Sales promotion commission was treated as prima facie eligible as an input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, because such promotional activity is not confined to the factory premises and may necessarily take place outside it. On that prima facie view, the objection based on the absence of activity within the factory was rejected at the interim stage. The appellant was therefore granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>