https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123125 The Court considered whether authorities committed civil contempt by wilfully disobeying an earlier writ order requiring timely amendment of a licence. It noted that the amendment was not completed within the stipulated period and that the authorities should have sought extension if difficulties arose. However, the licence was eventually amended, and the delay was explained as unintentional. The Court deprecated the unsatisfactory handling of the petitioner's request but held that the material did not establish wilful disobedience or justify a finding of civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. No civil contempt was made out. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123125 The Court considered whether authorities committed civil contempt by wilfully disobeying an earlier writ order requiring timely amendment of a licence. It noted that the amendment was not completed within the stipulated period and that the authorities should have sought extension if difficulties arose. However, the licence was eventually amended, and the delay was explained as unintentional. The Court deprecated the unsatisfactory handling of the petitioner's request but held that the material did not establish wilful disobedience or justify a finding of civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. No civil contempt was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123125