<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 486 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal filed beyond the limitation period, emphasizing the necessity of actual receipt of orders for calculating appeal periods. The decision stressed the importance of valid service methods and granted the appellant an opportunity for a personal hearing before the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 486 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal filed beyond the limitation period, emphasizing the necessity of actual receipt of orders for calculating appeal periods. The decision stressed the importance of valid service methods and granted the appellant an opportunity for a personal hearing before the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>