https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123098 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, set aside the impugned order due to lack of evidence supporting demand confirmation, penalty imposition, and interest charging of Rs. 24,09,797. The order was criticized for being superficial and failing to disclose the basis for the decisions made. The Appellants, engaged in manufacturing food products under the brand name "National's," successfully argued against unsubstantiated allegations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence and substantiation in such cases, highlighting the need for thorough examination before confirming demands, imposing penalties, and charging interest. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:21:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123098 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, set aside the impugned order due to lack of evidence supporting demand confirmation, penalty imposition, and interest charging of Rs. 24,09,797. The order was criticized for being superficial and failing to disclose the basis for the decisions made. The Appellants, engaged in manufacturing food products under the brand name "National's," successfully argued against unsubstantiated allegations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence and substantiation in such cases, highlighting the need for thorough examination before confirming demands, imposing penalties, and charging interest. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123098