<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 491 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules to the applicant, a statutory auditor of a private limited company. Despite allegations by the Revenue that the applicant colluded with another entity to misrepresent seized currency, the Tribunal found no evidence of tampering with account books. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, waiving the entire penalty and allowing the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 491 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules to the applicant, a statutory auditor of a private limited company. Despite allegations by the Revenue that the applicant colluded with another entity to misrepresent seized currency, the Tribunal found no evidence of tampering with account books. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, waiving the entire penalty and allowing the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>