<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 860 -  ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the college qualified for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) as it was substantially financed by the Government, operated solely for educational purposes, and not for profit. The surplus income of Rs. 46,97,349 was deemed exempt. The disallowance of Rs. 14,61,000 was overturned, and the need for an audit report under section 12A(b) was considered irrelevant. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 860 -  ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the college qualified for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) as it was substantially financed by the Government, operated solely for educational purposes, and not for profit. The surplus income of Rs. 46,97,349 was deemed exempt. The disallowance of Rs. 14,61,000 was overturned, and the need for an audit report under section 12A(b) was considered irrelevant. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>