<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 682 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123046</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal. The addition of advertising revenues made by the Assessing Officer was deleted as the issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the deletion of interest charges under sections 234B and 234C by the CIT(A) was upheld by the Tribunal based on established legal precedents and principles, emphasizing the importance of adherence to tax assessment guidelines and relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 682 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123046</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal. The addition of advertising revenues made by the Assessing Officer was deleted as the issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the deletion of interest charges under sections 234B and 234C by the CIT(A) was upheld by the Tribunal based on established legal precedents and principles, emphasizing the importance of adherence to tax assessment guidelines and relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>