<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 657 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the tax paid by the employer for the employee qualifies as a non-monetary perquisite exempt under section 10(10CC) of the Income-tax Act. It ruled that interest under section 234B was not applicable due to a bona fide dispute regarding TDS. The challenge against penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was dismissed as not pressed. The Assessing Officer was instructed to adjust the assessment orders accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 657 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the tax paid by the employer for the employee qualifies as a non-monetary perquisite exempt under section 10(10CC) of the Income-tax Act. It ruled that interest under section 234B was not applicable due to a bona fide dispute regarding TDS. The challenge against penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was dismissed as not pressed. The Assessing Officer was instructed to adjust the assessment orders accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>