<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 648 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123032</link>
    <description>Software supplied under a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive licence was treated as consideration for sale of a copyright article, because copyright remained with the assessee and the agreement did not transfer copyright rights. Applying the same contractual terms as in the earlier year, the Tribunal held that the receipt did not constitute royalty under Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. The payment was therefore not taxable as royalty on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 648 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123032</link>
      <description>Software supplied under a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive licence was treated as consideration for sale of a copyright article, because copyright remained with the assessee and the agreement did not transfer copyright rights. Applying the same contractual terms as in the earlier year, the Tribunal held that the receipt did not constitute royalty under Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. The payment was therefore not taxable as royalty on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>