<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 798 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123017</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision on modifications and additions made, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The judgment emphasized recognizing income under uncertain circumstances and accurate reconciliation of accounts for determining taxable income. The additions related to business promotion expenses disallowance and turnover suppression were affirmed, with the tribunal ruling that only the profit element attributable to the turnover should be taxed in cases of turnover suppression. The issue of delay in payments of employees&#039; State insurance contributions was briefly mentioned but not extensively addressed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 798 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123017</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision on modifications and additions made, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The judgment emphasized recognizing income under uncertain circumstances and accurate reconciliation of accounts for determining taxable income. The additions related to business promotion expenses disallowance and turnover suppression were affirmed, with the tribunal ruling that only the profit element attributable to the turnover should be taxed in cases of turnover suppression. The issue of delay in payments of employees&#039; State insurance contributions was briefly mentioned but not extensively addressed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>