<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 756 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123006</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the TDS amount did not constitute taxable income for the assessee. The judgment emphasized the difference between TDS collection and actual taxable income, highlighting that TDS deduction does not automatically mean taxable income for the recipient. The decision was supported by legal principles and case law, affirming that the revenue&#039;s claim lacked legal merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 756 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123006</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the TDS amount did not constitute taxable income for the assessee. The judgment emphasized the difference between TDS collection and actual taxable income, highlighting that TDS deduction does not automatically mean taxable income for the recipient. The decision was supported by legal principles and case law, affirming that the revenue&#039;s claim lacked legal merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>