<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 899 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted various issues back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation, emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessees and the application of settled legal principles. Some additions were upheld, while others were directed to be deleted or reconsidered based on further factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 899 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted various issues back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation, emphasizing the need for a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessees and the application of settled legal principles. Some additions were upheld, while others were directed to be deleted or reconsidered based on further factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>