<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the stay petition due to lack of a prima facie case and failure to demonstrate financial hardship. The Assessing Officer did not follow the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s directions on Transfer Pricing adjustments and research and development expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination and directed the assessee to pay a specified sum for an expedited appeal hearing, highlighting the importance of timely resolution in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the stay petition due to lack of a prima facie case and failure to demonstrate financial hardship. The Assessing Officer did not follow the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s directions on Transfer Pricing adjustments and research and development expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination and directed the assessee to pay a specified sum for an expedited appeal hearing, highlighting the importance of timely resolution in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>