<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1288 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was unwarranted as there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Additionally, the provisions of section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividend were deemed inapplicable to the assessee, who was not a registered shareholder. The Tribunal referenced legal interpretations and precedents to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1288 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was unwarranted as there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Additionally, the provisions of section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividend were deemed inapplicable to the assessee, who was not a registered shareholder. The Tribunal referenced legal interpretations and precedents to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>