<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 504 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122957</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the original Final Order, emphasizing the importance of following established legal principles and Supreme Court decisions in matters of unjust enrichment in provisional assessment cases. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the significance of equity and statutory recognition of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 504 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122957</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the original Final Order, emphasizing the importance of following established legal principles and Supreme Court decisions in matters of unjust enrichment in provisional assessment cases. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the significance of equity and statutory recognition of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>