<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 587 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122942</link>
    <description>In a stay application concerning utilisation of service tax credit to pay central excise duty, the Tribunal examined only prima facie relief at the pre-deposit stage. It noted that the merits of the entitlement to use the credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 would be decided in the appeal, and therefore directed deposit of only part of the disputed duty. The balance duty demand and the penalty were stayed until final adjudication, leaving the underlying admissibility and utilisation of credit open for determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 587 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122942</link>
      <description>In a stay application concerning utilisation of service tax credit to pay central excise duty, the Tribunal examined only prima facie relief at the pre-deposit stage. It noted that the merits of the entitlement to use the credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 would be decided in the appeal, and therefore directed deposit of only part of the disputed duty. The balance duty demand and the penalty were stayed until final adjudication, leaving the underlying admissibility and utilisation of credit open for determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>