<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 560 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122927</link>
    <description>The appeal seeking condonation of a 4 1/2-year delay in challenging an order confirming duty and penalty was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s belief that duty payment was unnecessary did not justify the delay in appealing. The Tribunal emphasized the obligation to challenge orders through proper channels within the prescribed period. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption benefits based on certain notifications was rejected as they forfeited their right to appeal in a timely manner. The Tribunal clarified that Section 154 of the Customs Act did not apply to correct substantive issues like exemption notifications, as it only allows rectification of arithmetical errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 560 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122927</link>
      <description>The appeal seeking condonation of a 4 1/2-year delay in challenging an order confirming duty and penalty was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s belief that duty payment was unnecessary did not justify the delay in appealing. The Tribunal emphasized the obligation to challenge orders through proper channels within the prescribed period. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption benefits based on certain notifications was rejected as they forfeited their right to appeal in a timely manner. The Tribunal clarified that Section 154 of the Customs Act did not apply to correct substantive issues like exemption notifications, as it only allows rectification of arithmetical errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>