https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122923 The Tribunal upheld the restoration of the appeal as per the High Court's order, noting the appellants' compliance with deposit requirements and timely notification to the Registry. Despite a delay in listing the appeal for final hearing due to Registry oversight, the Tribunal found no grounds for rectification, emphasizing the absence of mistakes in the restoration process. The Commissioner's objection to the delay and lapse in restoration was rejected, and the appeal was scheduled for a specific date, affirming the restoration based on the High Court's directive. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:05:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122923 The Tribunal upheld the restoration of the appeal as per the High Court's order, noting the appellants' compliance with deposit requirements and timely notification to the Registry. Despite a delay in listing the appeal for final hearing due to Registry oversight, the Tribunal found no grounds for rectification, emphasizing the absence of mistakes in the restoration process. The Commissioner's objection to the delay and lapse in restoration was rejected, and the appeal was scheduled for a specific date, affirming the restoration based on the High Court's directive. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122923