<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 375 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; findings that the appellants failed to fulfill their obligations under the Notification, citing the precedent set by the Apex Court. The appeal and related applications were dismissed due to the lack of evidence supporting the grounds raised by the hospital, emphasizing the importance of compliance with legal requirements and providing substantial evidence to support claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:11:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 375 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; findings that the appellants failed to fulfill their obligations under the Notification, citing the precedent set by the Apex Court. The appeal and related applications were dismissed due to the lack of evidence supporting the grounds raised by the hospital, emphasizing the importance of compliance with legal requirements and providing substantial evidence to support claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>