<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 481 - CESTAT,CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122871</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving a demand for a differential duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The dispute centered around the alleged relationship between the appellants and the buyer, M/s. Velvette International Pharma Products Ltd. The Tribunal found that the buyer was not related to the assessee as claimed by the Commissioner, emphasizing the need to establish a relationship between natural persons, not juristic persons, on the Boards of Directors of the two companies. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the duty and penalty amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 481 - CESTAT,CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122871</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving a demand for a differential duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The dispute centered around the alleged relationship between the appellants and the buyer, M/s. Velvette International Pharma Products Ltd. The Tribunal found that the buyer was not related to the assessee as claimed by the Commissioner, emphasizing the need to establish a relationship between natural persons, not juristic persons, on the Boards of Directors of the two companies. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the duty and penalty amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>