https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122862 The Appellant challenged the allegation of clandestine removal of 3.5 MT iron and steel products and unaccounted excess stock of 486.845 MT. The Appellate Tribunal found insufficient evidence connecting the Appellant to the alleged offenses. The matter was remanded for further examination and cross-examination to establish the allegations. The Tribunal confirmed the excess stock value and directed re-determination of duty liability and penalties by the Appellate Authority. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and proper documentation in determining duty liability and penalties accurately. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:55:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122862 The Appellant challenged the allegation of clandestine removal of 3.5 MT iron and steel products and unaccounted excess stock of 486.845 MT. The Appellate Tribunal found insufficient evidence connecting the Appellant to the alleged offenses. The matter was remanded for further examination and cross-examination to establish the allegations. The Tribunal confirmed the excess stock value and directed re-determination of duty liability and penalties by the Appellate Authority. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and proper documentation in determining duty liability and penalties accurately. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122862