https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122860 The Gujarat High Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing a review application, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and the need for substantial justice. The court noted that the reasons provided by the applicants, including engaging an inexperienced advocate and financial constraints, did not justify the substantial delay of 675 days. The court highlighted that a review of an order can only occur in case of an apparent error on the face of the record, leading to the rejection of the motion. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122860 The Gujarat High Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing a review application, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and the need for substantial justice. The court noted that the reasons provided by the applicants, including engaging an inexperienced advocate and financial constraints, did not justify the substantial delay of 675 days. The court highlighted that a review of an order can only occur in case of an apparent error on the face of the record, leading to the rejection of the motion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122860