<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 855 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for deduction under section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the processes undertaken by the assessee, involving mixing, drying, grinding, and filtering various herbal products to produce distinct commercial products, qualified as manufacturing. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal found that the transformation of raw materials into new products with different commercial identities met the criteria for manufacturing. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 855 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for deduction under section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the processes undertaken by the assessee, involving mixing, drying, grinding, and filtering various herbal products to produce distinct commercial products, qualified as manufacturing. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal found that the transformation of raw materials into new products with different commercial identities met the criteria for manufacturing. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>